wikipedia.org
Wikipedia
A free encyclopedia built collaboratively using wiki software. (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License).
Statistics Summary for wikipedia.org
| Alexa Traffic Rank | Reputation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
6 Global Rank
Alexa Traffic RankAn estimate of wikipedia.org's popularity. The rank is calculated using a combination of average daily visitors to wikipedia.org and pageviews on wikipedia.org over the past 3 months. The site with the highest combination of visitors and pageviews is ranked #1. Learn more. Updated Daily |
6 Rank in
US
Traffic Rank in CountryAn estimate of wikipedia.org's popularity in a specific country. The rank by country is calculated using a combination of average daily visitors to wikipedia.org and pageviews on wikipedia.org from users from that country over the past 3 months. The site with the highest combination of visitors and pageviews is ranked #1 in that country. Updated Daily |
Sites Linking In
Sites Linking InA measure of wikipedia.org's reputation. The number of links to wikipedia.org from sites visited by users in the Alexa traffic panel. Links that were not seen by users in the Alexa traffic panel are not counted. Multiple links from the same site are only counted once. Updated Monthly |
173 Reviews
|
| Did you know? You can enhance your Site Listing by displaying your Visitors and Pageviews. Find out how! | |||
Traffic rank for wikipedia.org:
| Traffic Rank | Change | ||
| Yesterday | 6 | +1 |  |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 day | 6 | 0 | |
| 1 month | 6 | 0 | |
| 3 month | 6 | 0 | |
Estimated percentage of global pageviews on wikipedia.org:
| Pageviews | Change | ||
| Yesterday | 0.5182 | -2.5% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 day | 0.5412 | -0.7% | |
| 1 month | 0.5564 | +5.51% |  |
| 3 month | 0.5446 | +0.73% | |
Estimated percentage of global internet users who visit wikipedia.org:
| Reach | Change | ||
| Yesterday | 14.71 | -2.6% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 day | 14.58 | +0.2% | |
| 1 month | 14.94 | +7.9% | |
| 3 month | 14.453 | +1.44% | |
Estimated percentage of visits to wikipedia.org that consist of a single pageview:
| Bounce % | Change | ||
| Yesterday | 53.8 | 0% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 day | 53.3 | 0% | |
| 1 month | 52.7 | 0% | |
| 3 month | 52.7 | 0% | |
Estimated daily unique pageviews per user for wikipedia.org:
| Pageviews/User | Change | ||
| Yesterday | 3.84 | 0% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 day | 3.95 | -1% | |
| 1 month | 3.94 | -2.2% | |
| 3 month | 3.95 | -0.8% | |
Estimated daily time on site (mm:ss) for wikipedia.org:
| Time on Site | Change | ||
| Yesterday | 04:43 | +2% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 day | 04:45 | -1% | |
| 1 month | 04:42 | -2% | |
| 3 month | 04:44 | -1% | |
Estimated percentage of visits to wikipedia.org that came from a search engine:
| Search % | Change | ||
| Yesterday | 40.5 | +2% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 day | 40.3 | 0% | |
| 1 month | 40.5 | -4% | |
| 3 month | 41.9 | -19% | |
Average Load Time for Wikipedia.org
Fast (1.188 Seconds), 60% of sites are slower.
Wikipedia.org’s Regional Traffic Ranks
Country
Rank
Switzerland
Germany
6
Italy
6
France
6
Austria
6
Sweden
6
Belgium
6
India
7
Canada
7
Australia
Philippines
United Kingdom
Spain
8
Netherlands
Iran
8
Pakistan
8
Malaysia
8
Japan
9
Mexico
9
Poland
9
South Africa
Colombia
9
Russia
10
Argentina
10
Venezuela
10
Ukraine
10
Thailand
10
Indonesia
12
Brazil
13
Turkey
13
South Korea
16
China
76
Where Visitors Go on Wikipedia.org
Subdomain
Percent of Visitors
en.wikipedia.org
60.70%
es.wikipedia.org
7.44%
de.wikipedia.org
7.41%
ja.wikipedia.org
7.20%
ru.wikipedia.org
5.59%
fr.wikipedia.org
4.88%
wikipedia.org
3.65%
it.wikipedia.org
3.24%
pt.wikipedia.org
2.31%
zh.wikipedia.org
1.90%
pl.wikipedia.org
1.54%
ar.wikipedia.org
1.16%
nl.wikipedia.org
0.96%
fa.wikipedia.org
0.83%
tr.wikipedia.org
0.70%
id.wikipedia.org
0.65%
sv.wikipedia.org
0.47%
cs.wikipedia.org
0.32%
fi.wikipedia.org
0.27%
wikipedia.de
0.25%
no.wikipedia.org
0.24%
th.wikipedia.org
0.23%
el.wikipedia.org
0.22%
ro.wikipedia.org
0.22%
hu.wikipedia.org
0.22%
ko.wikipedia.org
0.21%
he.wikipedia.org
0.18%
da.wikipedia.org
0.17%
vi.wikipedia.org
0.17%
uk.wikipedia.org
0.12%
bg.wikipedia.org
0.12%
simple.wikipedia.org
0.11%
hr.wikipedia.org
0.11%
sk.wikipedia.org
0.09%
ca.wikipedia.org
0.08%
sr.wikipedia.org
0.08%
az.wikipedia.org
0.07%
hi.wikipedia.org
0.06%
Audience Snapshot
Top Search Queries for Wikipedia.org
| Query | Percent of Search Traffic |
|---|
| 1 | 0.64% | |
| 2 | wikipedia | 0.54% |
| 3 | youtube | 0.21% |
| 4 | happy holidays | 0.19% |
| 5 | 0.14% | |
| 6 | let it snow | 0.11% |
| 7 | robert noyce | 0.11% |
Site Audit If you want to improve your SEO techniques, increase your organic search traffic, and ensure complete site analytics tag coverage, this tool is for you.
Toolbar Creator Generate your own custom toolbar and promote it to your visitors to increase engagement and generate more frequent visits to your site.
Edit Your Listing Update your listing on Alexa, including your site description, contact information, and more.
View All Access all of Alexa’s Site Tools.
Search Traffic
The percentage of site visits from search engines.
| Period | Percent of Site Traffic |
|---|
| Last 30 days | 40.5% |
| Last 7 days | 40.3% |
| Yesterday | 40.5% |
Top Queries from Search Traffic
The top queries driving traffic to wikipedia.org from search engines. Updated monthly.
| Query | Percent of Search Traffic |
|---|
| 1 | 0.64% | |
| 2 | wikipedia | 0.54% |
| 3 | youtube | 0.21% |
| 4 | happy holidays | 0.19% |
| 5 | 0.14% | |
| 6 | let it snow | 0.11% |
| 7 | robert noyce | 0.11% |
| 8 | christmas | 0.09% |
| 9 | yahoo | 0.08% |
| 10 | gmail | 0.08% |
Identify which keywords are searched for, which keywords drive the most traffic and what the PPC bids are using Trellian's KeywordDiscovery.com keyword tool.
Search Traffic on the Rise and Decline
The top queries from search engines driving relatively more/less traffic to wikipedia.org in the current month than the previous month. Updated monthly.
| Search Query | 1 Month Increase
The change in percentage of search traffic to wikipedia.org for each query.
|
|---|
| 1 | happy holidays | 0.19% |
| 2 | let it snow | 0.11% |
| 3 | robert noyce | 0.11% |
| 4 | christmas | 0.08% |
| 5 | infinite kpop | 0.06% |
| 6 | mark twain | 0.05% |
| 7 | merry christmas | 0.04% |
| 8 | diego rivera | 0.04% |
| 9 | hanukkah | 0.04% |
| 10 | sopa | 0.03% |
| Search Query | 1 Month Decline
The change in percentage of search traffic to wikipedia.org for each query.
|
|---|
| 1 | terre zone habitable | 0.13% |
| 2 | louis daguerre | 0.08% |
| 3 | 0.06% | |
| 4 | wikipedia | 0.06% |
| 5 | halloween | 0.05% |
| 6 | stanislaw lem | 0.05% |
| 7 | steve jobs | 0.03% |
| 8 | marie curie | 0.03% |
| 9 | sunny leone | 0.03% |
| 10 | revue pornographique | 0.03% |
Search Advertising Metrics Highlights
Data provided by iSpionage. Visit iSpionage to discover additional information metrics for wikipedia.org.
| Last Month Stats (Estimated) | ||
|---|---|---|
| PPC Budget | ||
| Last Month Clicks | ||
| Avg. Ad Position | ||
| Google PPC Keywords | ||
| Yahoo PPC Keywords | ||
High Impact Search Queries for wikipedia.orgPopular queries that are relevant to this site and are actively targeted by competitors advertising on search engines. Click on queries below to discover who is advertising for these queries. |
|||
| Query
Query A phrase that drives traffic to “wikipedia.org” from search engines. This list also includes sub-phrases that account for a high percentage of this site's search traffic broken out separately. For example, if the site receives traffic for 'buy diamond ring', 'diamond necklace', and 'diamond bracelet', the word 'diamond' might also appear in the list. |
Impact Factor
Impact Factor A high value indicates that “wikipedia.org” is getting significant organic search traffic for queries containing these phrases, despite high advertising competition for these phrases. Impact Factor is a combined measurement of the importance of a particular phrase to the site's search traffic and the level of search engine advertising competition (QCI). The index is on a scale of 0 to 100. Updated Monthly |
Query Popularity
Query Popularity An estimate of how frequently users search for these keywords, on a scale from 0 to 100. Higher numbers indicate higher frequencies. Updated Monthly |
QCI
The Query Competition Index QCI indicates the typical number of ads displayed for keyword searches on major search engines. A large number of ads indicates strong advertising competition for a query. The index is on a scale from 0 to 100. Updated Monthly |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.20 | 100 | 20 | |
| happy holidays | 3.28 | 60 | 20 |
| sex | 2.92 | 77 | 29 |
| christmas | 2.84 | 59 | 34 |
| youtube | 2.74 | 94 | 15 |
| seo | 2.07 | 71 | 48 |
| let it snow | 1.46 | 71 | 20 |
| vpn | 1.27 | 62 | 44 |
| diego rivera | 0.91 | 56 | 25 |
| android | 0.91 | 70 | 25 |
| mark twain | 0.89 | 60 | 19 |
| hanukkah | 0.84 | 52 | 31 |
| justin bieber | 0.82 | 67 | 22 |
| dajjal | 0.81 | 63 | 13 |
| louis daguerre | 0.76 | 59 | 36 |
| ebay | 0.71 | 85 | 12 |
| web design | 0.69 | 58 | 67 |
| windows 8 | 0.67 | 65 | 18 |
| merry christmas | 0.64 | 56 | 16 |
| how i met your mother | 0.61 | 65 | 18 |
| christmas tree | 0.60 | 48 | 48 |
| michael jackson | 0.59 | 61 | 28 |
| cloud computing | 0.59 | 55 | 54 |
| lady gaga | 0.57 | 66 | 26 |
| santa claus | 0.56 | 50 | 30 |
| kama sutra | 0.54 | 72 | 23 |
| lindsay lohan | 0.51 | 61 | 19 |
| harry potter | 0.51 | 66 | 24 |
| web hosting | 0.51 | 54 | 74 |
| rihanna | 0.49 | 63 | 19 |
Search Engine Marketing (SEM) Activity by wikipedia.org
Ads for wikipedia.org have appeared on major search engines when people performed the queries below. Click on the queries below to discover more information.
|
Search Engine Marketing (SEM) Opportunities for wikipedia.orgQueries that provide opportunities for this site to advertise through Search Engine Marketing (SEM) to get more traffic. They are popular queries that are relevant to the site, and have low competition in search engine marketing. Learn More Many sites are actively advertising in search engines for the most valuable search queries. This high level of competition tends to result in high advertising costs, which makes it difficult to find attractive advertising opportunities. These opportunities may still exist, however, by looking at the "long tail". The long tail contains search queries with lower Query Popularity, but such queries also tend to have lower QCI. By advertising for many of these queries, sites may still be able to manage an effective search engine marketing campaign. Note that not all queries on the long tail may be very relevant to this site, but this list may contain a number of strong advertising candidates. |
|||
|
P.O. Box 78350
San Francisco, CA 94107
US
info-en [at] wikimedia.org
Company Info
| Employees: | 0 - 25 |
|---|---|
| Revenue: | $1 - 10M |
| Ownership: | Other |
Contacts by Department
- Marketing: 1
- Human Resources: 1
Contacts by Level
- VP-Level: 1
See wikipedia.org email and phone contacts.
Whois
Who is wikipedia.org? Whois lookup at GoDaddy.
Site Audit If you want to improve your SEO techniques, increase your organic search traffic, and ensure complete site analytics tag coverage, this tool is for you.
Toolbar Creator Generate your own custom toolbar and promote it to your visitors to increase engagement and generate more frequent visits to your site.
Edit Your Listing Update your listing on Alexa, including your site description, contact information, and more.
View All Access all of Alexa’s Site Tools.
Review Summary for wikipedia.org
| Likes | |
|---|---|
| Good content | 94 |
| Good deals | 16 |
| Good customer support | 24 |
| Active community | 59 |
| Easy to navigate | 65 |
| Site is fast and responsive | 62 |
| Dislikes | |
|---|---|
| Poor customer support | 14 |
| Hard to navigate | 12 |
| Site is slow and unresponsive | 3 |
Reviews for wikipedia.org
this site to a friend
- I'm Very Thankful for Wikipedia
- Feb 06, 2012
The best use of this site is Entertainment.
- Good content
Comments: Wikipedia is the first place I go when I am researching a fact or a place and need more detail. It's one of my favorite websites!
this site to a friend
- Pretty Good Job
- Feb 05, 2012
The best use of this site is Research.
- Good content
- Site is fast and responsive
Comments: I like finding a good wiki page it saves me so much time hunting on google reading many links. But, sometimes the pages are lack luster and do not really help. But, for the most part about 70 percent of the time I read a good to excellent wiki on a subject. Good job!
this site to a friend
- Very good site
- Feb 05, 2012
The best use of this site is Research.
- Active community
- Easy to navigate
- Good content
- Site is fast and responsive
Comments: Very good website.
this site to a friend
- Thanks for the efforts and your passion
- Feb 04, 2012
The best use of this site is Research.
- Active community
- Easy to navigate
- Good content
- Other
- Site is fast and responsive
- Poor customer support
Comments: Great website. Would just like it to be easier to post contributions in there but still much better than most sites on the interet
this site to a friend
- The Best User-Based Encyclopedia on the Internet
- Jan 29, 2012
The best use of this site is Research.
- Active community
- Easy to navigate
- Good content
- Good customer support
- Other
- Site is fast and responsive
- Other
Comments: Although not a great website to base your essay or PowerPoint off, Wikipedia is the best user-based and freely edited encyclopedia currently on the internet. Rarely will you find insufficient information or citations for subjects and even with it being edited by normal people all the time, the information on the articles always tend to remain accurate and up-to-date. Whenever someone inserts inaccurate information or attempts to "troll" others by messing with Wikipedia articles, the misinformation is deleted and correctly almost immediately. My only opposition to the products of the Wikimedia Foundation is that they're not always accurate, since it is all edited and submitted by the users. Other than that relatively minor issue, I highly recommend Wikipedia as a source of reference and general information.
this site to a friend
- Wikipedia Best Site
- Jan 26, 2012
The best use of this site is Research.
Comments: oiueiourew uioreuwruoeiwru rouieiowuroiewthis site to a friend
- Excellent Reference Tool
- Jan 26, 2012
The best use of this site is Research.
- Easy to navigate
- Good content
Comments: Whenever I want to find information about a topic I refer to Wikipedia. It is a shining example of how the world can contribute to and benefit from free resources on the internet. A great feature of the site is the format of the articles and the editorial control that ensures the content is usually very high quality and makes an excellent reference tool. On the downside, disputes between senior administrators can sometimes lead to subjective information being excluded so articles might not include controversial details about a topic. I recommend checking the main page daily as it shows an interesting selection of news and article highlights from within the site.
this site to a friend
- Great Information
- Jan 18, 2012
The best use of this site is Research.
- Good content
- Other
Comments: Great site with good content.
this site to a friend
The best use of this site is Research.
- Easy to navigate
- Site is fast and responsive
- Other
Comments: This website not so bad ,also perfect rank ,But i do not understand they ask donate and asking help . if you need help we only give foods and soft drinks. Poor people poor because never ask help they have honor. Reach people ask donate this is new way to ask money . Wikipedia no need ask donate ,take banner ads earn money but they don't .So what can i do........................... NOTE: If you need to review to your website in Alexa , visit my website and review me I will do it same for your. After i got review . (i will give 5 star review to you and I will visit our website ) thanks for help storecx com
this site to a friend
- Better than the web itself
- Jan 15, 2012
The best use of this site is Research.
- Good content
- Hard to navigate
Comments: besides shopping sites wikipedia to me is the most important site on the web. who would have ever thought of an encylopidia that millions contribute to. it's the most important development on the web (yeah, even more than facebook) and even though some content is wrong sometimes for the most part its all good.
Site Audit If you want to improve your SEO techniques, increase your organic search traffic, and ensure complete site analytics tag coverage, this tool is for you.
Toolbar Creator Generate your own custom toolbar and promote it to your visitors to increase engagement and generate more frequent visits to your site.
Edit Your Listing Update your listing on Alexa, including your site description, contact information, and more.
View All Access all of Alexa’s Site Tools.
Audience Demographics for Wikipedia.org
Relative to the general internet population how popular is wikipedia.org with each audience below?
Relative to the general internet population, 18-24 year olds are over-represented at wikipedia.org.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among 25-34 year olds is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among 35-44 year olds is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among 45-54 year olds is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among 55-64 year olds is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
Relative to the general internet population, people over 65 years old are under-represented at wikipedia.org.Confidence: high
Relative to the general internet population, people who did not go to college are under-represented at wikipedia.org.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among people some college education is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among people who went to college is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among people who went to graduate school is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among Males is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among Females is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
Relative to the general internet population, people with children are under-represented at wikipedia.org.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among people without children is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among people browsing from home is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
Relative to the general internet population, people browsing from school are over-represented at wikipedia.org.Confidence: high
The audience for wikipedia.org among people browsing from work is similar to the general internet population.Confidence: high
Advanced Demographics for wikipedia.org
Audience breakdown by income, ethnicity, age, education, gender, children and browsing location.
Visitors by Country for Wikipedia.org
Country
Percent of Visitors
20.5%
7.8%
7.0%
6.5%
4.5%
4.2%
3.5%
3.5%
2.4%
2.4%
4.2%
3.5%
3.5%
2.4%
2.4%
2.4%
2.3%
1.6%
1.6%
1.4%
1.2%
1.1%
0.9%
0.9%
0.9%
0.8%
0.8%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.7%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
0.6%
